Shoulder pain management strategies and early functional outcome after arthroscopic rotator cuff tear repair. A randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: The management of acute postoperative pain after rotator cuff surgery can be challenging. To our knowledge, there are no data available in the literature correlating satisfactory pain control with improvement in terms of function. The purposes of the present study were to evaluate: 1) pain pattern after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in patients operated with two different techniques (transosseous vs transosseous equivalent); 2) safety/efficacy of three different pharmacological pain control strategies; 3) possible relationship between a correct shoulder pain management protocol in the early post-operative period and patients' functional improvement. METHODS: 114 patients underwent rotator cuff tear repair, either with a Transosseus or a Transosseus equivalent technique. 62 (54%) were male and 52 (46%) were female. The average age was 59 ± 9 years. They were randomly assigned into three different pain management protocols: Paracetamol as needed (max 3 tablets/day) for 1 week (Protocol A), Paracetamol + Codein 1 tablet three times per day for 7 days (Protocol B), or Paracetamol + Ibuprofen 1 tablet two times per day for 7 days (Protocol C). Immediate passive mobilization of the operated shoulder was allowed. VAS and Passive Flexion values were recorded at 7 (T1), 15 (T2) and 30 (T3) days post-surgery. DASH values were recorded at 90 days post-surgery. All patients were asked to register any kind of signs/symptoms that may appear during drug assumption according to each pain management protocols. RESULTS: All the pain management protocols administered were well tolerated by all the study population, and no adverse signs/symptoms were highlighted during drug assumption. Pain pattern: in both surgical techniques, patients within Protocol A were associated with worst results in terms of mean VAS at each time point examined when compared to Protocol B and C (p < 0,05). In patients within Protocol A, no statistically significant differences were found at each point time examined comparing the two surgical techniques, with the exception of T2, where the TO was associated with an higher VAS value than TOE (p < 0.05). No differences were highlighted in Protocol B and C when comparing the values between two surgical techniques. ROM: in both surgical techniques, patients within Protocol A were associated with worst results in terms of mean PROM at each time point examined when compared to Protocol B and C (p < 0,05). In the TO group, patients within Protocol B had better PROM values at T1 (p < 0,05) and T2 (p < 0,05) compared to Protocol C, but no differences were highlighted at T3. In the TOE group, no statistically significant differences were found between patients within Protocol B and C at each time point examined. DASH: In the TO group, no statistically significant differences were found regarding the DASH values comparing Protocol B vs Protocol C, but they were highlighted comparing the values between Protocol A and Protocol B (p < 0,05), and between Protocol A and Protocol C (p < 0,05). Similar results were recorded in the TOE group. CONCLUSION: Post-operative pain is influenced by the surgical technique used being transosseous more painful in the first 15 days after surgery. Oral anti-inflammatory drugs are a feasible strategy to appropriately control post-operative pain. An association between Paracetamol and either Codein or Ibuprofen can lead to better outcomes in terms of VAS reduction and early recovery of passive ROM.

Fracture Avulsion of the Greater Tuberosity: Arthroscopic Transosseous Augmented Technique.

The fracture avulsion of the greater tuberosity (GT) represents 2% of all humerus fractures, but the true incidence is likely to be higher, being challenging the initial diagnosis on radiograph. The fracture avulsion of the GT could have different treatments: nondisplaced or minimally displaced fractures are treated conservatively, whereas for displaced or comminuted fractures surgical treatment is preferred. The most important finding of this study is the employment of an all-arthroscopic transosseous augmented technique for the treatment of a displaced humeral GT fracture avulsion. This technique shows all the advantages of the transosseous fixation and arthroscopic approach.

Outcome and revision rate of uncemented humeral head resurfacing: Mid-term follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: Glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA) is a common cause of pain and disability affecting nearly a third of the world's population over 60 years of age. As in other joints, shoulder arthroplasty appears to be the most effective treatment. The implant design has evolved during time transitioning to shorter humeral stem lengths or even stemless components. AIM: To evaluate the medium-term outcome and survival of a cementless humeral head resurfacing (HHR) in a group of patients affected with OA or avascular necrosis. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of prospectively collected data using HHR in 23 patients (15 female and 8 male) after a 7.4 year follow-up. The collected data included clinical and radiographical evaluation. The Constant score, the visual analogue scale, and a clinical evaluation of range of motion were registered pre- and postoperatively. Fifteen patients affected with OA (2 cases of mild, 6 moderate, and 7 severe) and 10 with avascular necrosis (stage III according to Cruess classification) were enrolled. X-rays were evaluated to detect loosening signs, degenerative changes, and superior humeral head migration. Magnetic resonance preoperatively was also performed to assess the rotator cuff status. Tendon integrity was mandatory to implant the HHR. RESULTS: In total, 19 patients (21 shoulders) completed the follow-up. Data on 4 shoulders, in 4 patients, were lost because of prosthesis failure. The global revision rate was 16%. A statistically significant improvement in the mean Constant score, visual analogue scale, and range of motion have been reported. No signs of loosening were registered, while in 12 cases a glenoid erosion was found. The osteophytes appeared 7 times on the humeral side and 12 on the glenoid. Superior humeral migration was recorded in only 1 case. CONCLUSION: HHR remains a reasonable option in patients with an intact rotator cuff for the treatment of OA and avascular necrosis.